header-logo header-logo

05 September 2013
Issue: 7574 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Call for national legal support fund

Solicitors to pay in dormant funds & City firms to sponsor major initiatives

Levies on payday loan companies and financial penalties on government contractors for faulty social security assessments could be used to fund legal advice centres, an influential think-tank has proposed.

The Low Commission, established by the Legal Action Group last October to develop a strategy for the future provision of social welfare law when the next government is formed in 2015, has collected the views of more than 230 individuals and organisations.

Its draft report estimates  that “there is about £400m per year available to fund advice and legal support services – mainly coming from local authorities, the Money Advice Service and the legal aid that remains for social welfare law”, and that a further £100m is needed each year to ensure basic provision.
It advocates the creation of a national advice and legal support fund of £50m per year for 10 years to fund advice and legal support work. Funds would be drawn from central government, with 90% of the money going to local authorities and the remainder for national initiatives.

To help finance this, and to promote good decision making, government contractors could be penalised on a “polluter pays” principle for decisions that are later overturned. The other £50m would come from statutory, voluntary and commercial bodies. The report suggests, for example, that the Financial Conduct Authority impose a levy on payday loan companies, while solicitors pay in any dormant funds relating to dissolved companies and unclaimed damages in collective actions, and City law firms sponsor national initiatives.
 

However, it says millions of pounds could be saved if public services bodies got decisions right in the first place, for example, 35% of the 340,000 welfare benefits appeals in 2011-2012, which cost £66m, were upheld.
Its other recommendations include a national legal helpline and more support for Mackenzie Friends. The Commission, chaired by Lord Colin Low, is asking for responses to its proposals by the end of this month, and will publish its final report in December.

Issue: 7574 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll