header-logo header-logo

20 May 2016 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7699 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

The cab conundrum

nlj_7699_samuels

Alec Samuels discusses the benefits of a universal taxi service

 

The consumer wants a reliable readily accessible taxi service. The distinction between taxi and car hire has become obsolescent and inconvenient and unsatisfactory. So “taxi” is used here for all the services, ie taxis, minicabs, Uber, which should come under one legal regime. The consumer wants the best service. The trade must be protected from unfair competition. The overall public interest must be considered, including safety and security for passengers and driver, fair charges and appropriate control of vehicles on the public highway. In essence, the issue comes down to the nature and extent of the regulation properly required, in a free but regulated market.

Fit & proper

Every driver should be a “fit and proper person”, of good character, subject to all the normal checks and to a strict professional discipline in the event of non-compliance. Consumers should be able to feel safe with the taxi driver.

Knowledge

A minimum working knowledge of English should be required, on a non-discriminatory basis. In these days of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll