header-logo header-logo

10 June 2014
Issue: 7610 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Busy in court

The Supreme Court has seen its busiest year to date, hearing 45% more appeals (120) than during 2012/13 and giving 49% more judgments (115). 

Just over a third of applicants were granted permission to appeal, according to the court’s annual report and accounts.

Justices are less likely to sit in panels of larger than five than in previous years—the number of appeals upon which seven or nine Justices sat fell to about 9% of hearings (compared with 11% in the previous year, and 24% in 2011/12 and 2010/11).

Jenny Rowe, chief executive of the court, says the court administration has “continued to deliver our core function of processing casework and providing support to the Justices, against a background of a workload which has become more demanding.”

The accounts showed the court spent £12.7m during the last year, 40% of which was judicial and staff costs, and recouped more than £7.5m in court fees and other income.

According to the report, the court will make projected savings of £65,000 per annum from next year after leaving Ministry of Justice IT contracts and agreeing terms with new suppliers.

Issue: 7610 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll