header-logo header-logo

10 July 2024
Issue: 8079 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Property , Construction
printer mail-detail

Building bonanza for homes & turbines

The government has lifted a ‘de facto ban’ on onshore windfarms in England, with immediate effect, as part of an overhaul of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF)

The ban was lifted by deleting two NPPF footnotes requiring proof of community support, which effectively refused permission for wind turbines in the event of any local opposition.

The government will also consult on bringing onshore wind into the significant infrastructure projects regime, which are decided nationally not locally, Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced in her first major speech this week.

Reeves said the government will take a growth-focused approach, reforming the NPPF, giving priority to energy projects and setting mandatory housing targets, including homes for social rents. An extra 300 planning officers will be recruited to support local authorities, and a taskforce set up to accelerate stalled housing sites, including at Liverpool docks and other sites representing more than 14,000 homes. Reeves reiterated Labour’s pledge to build 1.5 million homes in the next five years.

Local planning authorities will also be asked to review green belt boundaries, prioritising brownfield and grey belt land for development.

Welcoming the proposals, Daniel Browne, real estate & construction partner, Kingsley Napley, said: ‘A promise to increase planning officials across the country will help to ease delays in planning decisions, but the real gamechanger is the review of greenbelt land.

‘This will create new opportunities to build more houses, new towns and commercial hubs and should unlock investment and economic growth, first through a build and construction phase then later through the new purpose area when complete. With a rising environmental lobby this may not be all plain sailing, but developers will certainly be thinking afresh from today about the possibilities ahead.’

Issue: 8079 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Property , Construction
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll