header-logo header-logo

07 October 2022
Issue: 7998 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession , Covid-19 , Brexit , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Bubble & pop: Growth opportunities in the legal market

The past two years of growth in the legal market could be a bubble, which is about to pop, according to the latest LexisNexis Gross Legal Product (GLP) Index.

LexisNexis this week published an updated GLP Index, focusing solely on the corporate, commercial and competition segments of the legal market. It predicts these areas of law will slow ‘significantly’ through to 2024, with the rate of growth likely to equal what it was before COVID-19.

The LexisNexis GLP Index is inspired by the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) but pulls data from a broad range of sources to measure growth across multiple practice areas from Q1 2016 through to predictions for Q1 of 2024.

The latest update suggests that, after a ferocious post-COVID return to growth, the market will cool down substantially. It cites new challenges including rising inflation, new regulations and sanctions, while the threat of a recession appears to have stagnated growth in some practice areas.

It predicts a 22% decline in demand for corporate law by the end of 2022, as compared to 2021. This follows a surge in activity last year due to pent-up demand.

For commercial lawyers, their workloads will have risen by a mere 1% by the end of this year, as compared to 2021, although it will rise again in 2023 due to a rebound in activity for imports and exports, foreign investments and new companies being created.

However, it predicts 17% growth in competition law for the full 2022 year in comparison to 2021, and forecasts growth of 32% for the whole of 2023 as compared to this year. It attributes this increased workload to Brexit, the Competition and Markets Authority’s heightened stance towards competition enforcement and new security and sustainability measures coming into play.

Dylan Brown, the Index report’s editor, said: ‘The GLP Index is useful in highlighting areas of the law that are growing or falling in demand. 

‘It gives law firms and in-house teams some helpful hints as to where they could invest or reposition their resources. However, it is purely prediction, as we have drawn conclusions from publicly available data.

‘Today’s economically uncertain times have caused a great deal of unrest in the corporate world. There’s a constant barrage of conflicting reports coming out, and despite everything still being up in the air, the default setting for most businesses right now will be risk aversion.

‘It will be up to lawyers to instil confidence by guiding clients through the months and years ahead with accurate insights on economic activity, new legislation and regulations, and worthwhile growth opportunities.’

The report can be found here

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll