header-logo header-logo

27 April 2007 / Richard Frimston
Issue: 7270 / Categories: Features , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Brussels 4 U

Is private international law due to meet
its Waterloo? asks Richard Frimston

From 14 November 2007 Eurostar trains from Brussels Midi will no longer arrive at Waterloo, but terminate instead at St Pancras International. With similar ineluctability, the EU white paper—Succession and Wills (Brussels IV) will arrive in 2008 and probably be in force by 2011. Parliament and the Civil Service in England are still attempting to argue that it should never have set off in the first place.

The European Commission has always encouraged the free movement of goods, services and people, and thus mobility of European citizens. In 1999, European ministers agreed that mutual recognition of judicial decisions was one of their three priorities for action and it is now the cornerstone of judicial co-operation in both civil and criminal matters.

Franco Frattini, vice president of the Commission and responsible for justice, freedom and security, said in a press release in February 2005:

“In a Europe without internal frontiers where individuals are free to travel and settle where they wish, buy

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll