header-logo header-logo

10 April 2008
Issue: 7316 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Procedure & practice , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

In Brief

News

IN BRIEF

STRONGER SUPPORT

The three main solicitor support organisations— Solicitors Benevolent Association (SBA), Solicitors’ Assistance Scheme (SAS) and LawCare—have resolved to work more closely together in the provision of support and assistance to solicitors, their staff and families. The joint initiative has been launched in a bid to help lawyers tackle growing regulatory and other pressures. Many sole practitioners and smaller firms do not have the time to deal with client matters and comply with the mass of regulations and other administrative issues which arise, the groups say, and more support is needed.

 

BUNFIGHT HALTED

The looming court battle between the Law Society and two QC authors over the reproduction of the society’s Code of Conduct has been called off. Andrew Hopper QC and Gregory Treverton-Jones QC, authors of The Solicitor’s Handbook, threatened to sue the society after it refused to allow them to reproduce the full text of the code in a new version of their book—even though the Solicitors Regulation Authority had previously given the pair permission. The society will now publish the handbook in May 2008, which will contain the code of conduct in full.

 

DAMAGE CONTROL

A new approach to damages actions for breach of EC antitrust rules has been out lined by the European Commission in a White Paper. Recommendations include the introduction of representative actions for competition law breaches, opt-in collective actions in which victims can choose to participate and an EU-wide minimum level of disclosure inter partes involving judgecontrolled disclosure. Final infringement decisions of national competition authorities and review courts should be irrebuttable proof of the infringement in subsequent private enforcement proceedings, the paper says and the current acquis communautaire on the scope of damages should be codified.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll