header-logo header-logo

28 February 2008
Issue: 7310 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Legal services , Employment
printer mail-detail

In Brief

News

ABUSE FIGURES

Prosecutions for racially aggravated offences increased by more than a fifth last year, with 7,694 defendants being prosecuted. However, religiously aggravated cases fell by 37%, with 22 defendants facing prosecution. The director of public prosecutions, Sir Ken Macdonald QC, says the Crown Prosecution Service regards racist and religiously aggravated crimes as “particularly serious because victims are targeted solely because of their identity or beliefs”. “These crimes don’t just affect individual victims and their families but whole communities,” he adds.

 

HOMOPHOBIC BANTER

The Employment Appeal Tribunal has found that homophobic workplace banter is not covered under the Employment Equality (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/1661). The claimant in English v Thomas Sanderson Blinds Ltd, a heterosexual man, brought the claim after being subjected to sexual innuendo based on the fact that he had attended boarding school and lived in Brighton. The Employment Appeal Tribunal found that because the innuendo was not based on a perception or an assumption that the claimant was gay, it did not fall within the scope of the sexual orientation regulations. The judge referred the case to the Court of Appeal after describing the current position as unsatisfactory.

 

TRANSFER REVIEW

The Qualified Lawyers Transfer Regulations are to be reviewed by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA). The review aims to ensure that anyone who qualifies under the regulations has the knowledge and skills required to practise as a solicitor in England and Wales. The review will also provide assurances about fitness for purpose, standards and integrity of the Qualified Lawyers Transfer Test. New guidance for applicants and those who determine applications is also being reviewed to ensure applications made under the current transfer regulations are treated fairly and consistently.

Issue: 7310 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Legal services , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll