header-logo header-logo

14 November 2018
Issue: 7817 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Brexit worst case scenario

Law Society launches guidance papers outlining no deal risks

Prime minister Theresa May struggled to rally the Cabinet and MPs around a draft deal this week, as solicitors turned to professional guidance for advice on minimising the risks of a no deal Brexit.

The Law Society launched the first four guidance papers in a series last week, explaining the risks no deal presents for the provision of legal services in the EU, civil and commercial disputes, data and family law.

For example, the Brussels II Regulation helps families resolve disputes about divorce and child custody where parties live in more than one EU state. Under the regulation, EU courts automatically recognise judgments on matrimonial and parental responsibility.

However, Brussels II will no longer apply once Britain leaves the EU. Neither will the Maintenance Regulation, which helps ensure the payment of maintenance in cross border situations.

On financial disputes between businesses and individuals, Law Society president Christina Blacklaws said: ‘There are currently no international conventions that can be used to help and the result is that the enforcement of these judgments will depend on the national law or the possibility of relying on old bilateral conventions from the 1920s or 1930s.

‘Furthermore, it’s not clear, for example, what will happen with ongoing cases if we exit the EU without a deal. Our presumption is that as there is no reciprocity and no agreement on ongoing cases, even the judgments from these cases are not enforceable under the reciprocal EU rules.’

David Greene, NLJ consultant editor and senior partner at Edwin Coe, said: ‘The government has published a series of “technical papers” which set out the consequences of our departure from the EU without a negotiated agreement in various areas including civil justice co-operation. 

‘The Law Society has followed that lead with papers that address issues arising in practice for solicitors. The Law Society on behalf of the profession has made it clear that a no deal exit would be disastrous.

‘It is difficult to predict exactly the effect but the Law Society’s papers address the major issues that will arise so that solicitors address and prepare for those in case a deal is not done.’

Issue: 7817 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll