header-logo header-logo

Brexit: replacing the CJEU

07 February 2017
Issue: 7733 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

A post-Brexit UK could look to the “controversial” dispute system between Canada and the EU as a replacement for the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), a law professor has suggested.

The Brexit White Paper proposes to end the jurisdiction of the CJEU in the UK, and envisages a “new comprehensive, bold and ambitious free trade agreement” with the EU which “may take in elements of current Single Market arrangements”, as well as a soft border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. But what form of dispute resolution system will replace the CJEU?

Trevor Tayleur, associate professor at The University of Law, said: “If post-Brexit an EU member state were to restrict imports from the UK unlawfully and the UK wanted to challenge that restriction (or vice versa), then there needs to be a tribunal to adjudicate upon the dispute.

“An effective free trade agreement does require some form of supra-national enforcement mechanism which limits the freedom of action of the parties to it, so where

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll