header-logo header-logo

Brexit: a proposal

08 November 2016 / Jonathan Rickford
Categories: Opinion , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

Jonathan Rickford advocates taking the common sense approach towards Art 50 & the role of Parliament

Triggering Art 50 of the EU treaty will most probably lead to UK exit from the EU within a period of two years after notice of the decision to withdraw is given (the period can be extended if all 27 remaining members states agree, but that seems unlikely). Exit will come about either in accordance with an agreement between the UK, the Council of Ministers of the 27 member states and the European Parliament concluded within that period, or by the failure of the negotiations to conclude in time.

Whether the government has authority under the Royal Prerogative to give notice is a legal question decided in the negative by the Divisional Court on 3 November, but to be finally resolved by the Supreme Court before the year end (see Michael Zander QC, "Art 50: the verdict"). If the Supreme Court follows the reasoning of the High Court—that notice changes UK law—then primary legislation is required to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll