header-logo header-logo

23 September 2020
Issue: 7903 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Family , Pensions
printer mail-detail

Brexit countdown on pensions

The clock is ticking for obtaining effective UK pension sharing orders after an overseas divorce once the Brexit transitional period ends on December 31, practitioners are warning

The Ministry of Justice says it is considering what changes to the law might be required to allow divorcing couples outside England and Wales to obtain pension sharing orders.

However, Michael Allum and Stuart Clark, partners with International Family Law Group, say they have been pressing the government for many years to change domestic law to fill the gap and they are concerned whether it can now be done in time.

Without that change, couples living and domiciled abroad will no longer be able to obtain a UK pension sharing order and may have to revisit settlements or negotiations to achieve a fair outcome.

The issue arises because, while the English family court has the power to make financial orders - including pension sharing orders - after an overseas divorce, there has to be a sufficient connection through habitual residence or the domicile of one spouse in England for the courts to be able to make the order. 

Allum and Clark say this will present a ‘real difficulty’ for international families who no longer have that connection.  It is currently possible to use a residual power within the EU Maintenance Regulation to make needs-based orders, including pension sharing orders, on an exceptional basis, provided the courts of no other EU Member State have jurisdiction. But that will end when the transition period ends.

‘While we welcome the MoJ's commitment, our firm has been calling for this change in the law throughout the Brexit discussions,' they say. 

‘But time is now short so we strongly encourage any couples and their lawyers presently working out divorce financial arrangements which may involve sharing a UK pension to make sure an order is obtained before the end of the year. If not, they may be forced to revisit settlements which have been reached or are in the process of being negotiated to find alternative ways of achieving a fair distribution of assets without including any pensions administered in England.’

Meanwhile, research shows judges and family practitioners are changing tack in their approach to pensions sharing, following Pensions Advisory Group recommendations last year. Read more here

 

 

Issue: 7903 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Family , Pensions
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll