header-logo header-logo

Brexit brainstorming: data privacy

09 June 2016 / Mark Surguy , Lauren Grest
Issue: 7702 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Profession , Data protection
printer mail-detail
nlj_7702_grest

The idea of Brexit being a business-friendly dream may not hold up to the reality as Lauren Grest & Mark Surguy explain

The timing of the Brexit referendum has coincided with a tumultuous period for EU data legislation. First was the shock dissolution of the Safe Harbor agreement, then the draft of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) was released and the proposed EU-US Privacy shield is still being debated by the Article 29 Working Group. With the threat of Britain exiting the EU, this adds another layer of uncertainty for businesses and law firms who rely on or need to transfer electronic data.

The most pressing data protection implication of a Brexit centres on the GDPR. Unlike the incumbent Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC which has to be implemented by each member state but may result in inconsistency between states, the GDPR will apply uniformly across all EU member states, with the aim of harmonising data protection laws as well as offering increased data protection measures for EU citizens. Should the UK leave

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll