header-logo header-logo

14 December 2017
Issue: 7774 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Brexit back on track?

Prime Minister Theresa May moved to clarify her Brexit breakthrough this week, as lawyers welcomed agreement of the first phase of negotiations.

Speaking to MPs, May said: ‘The EU has accepted that we will incorporate the withdrawal agreement into UK law, and citizens’ rights will then be enforced by our courts—where appropriate, paying due regard to relevant ECJ (European Court of Justice) case law.’

For the first eight years post-Brexit, May said the courts would be able, on a voluntary basis, to ask the ECJ for an interpretation.

She said the precise terms of the implementation period ‘to give governments, businesses and families the time they need to implement the changes required’ would be discussed in the next phase of negotiations.

The first phase agreement is due to be approved by the 27 EU Member States this week.

Ros Kellaway, partner at Eversheds Sutherland, said: ‘A transition period is clearly on the table and looks remarkably like continued membership of the single market and the customs union whilst a trade deal is negotiated.

‘President Tusk has said the UK would have to “respect the whole of EU law, including new law” as well as contributing to the EU budget. This closely resembles the situation of Norway, who are not members of the EU and have no seat at the EU legislative table, but are the eighth largest contributor to the EU budget in exchange for membership of the single market. Norway is not a member of the customs union so is free to negotiate its own trade deals with the rest of the world.’

Law Society vice president Christina Blacklaws said: ‘We’re particularly pleased that the UK government has asked for a two-year transition including remaining for that period in the customs union and the single market.’

Issue: 7774 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll