header-logo header-logo

Brexit amendment rejected

14 June 2018
Issue: 7797 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Prime minister escapes defeat with last-minute concessions

The Prime Minister has narrowly escaped defeat by making last-minute concessions over the House of Lords amendment to give Parliament a ‘meaningful vote’ on the final Brexit deal.  

The amendment to the EU (Withdrawal) Bill was rejected by just 26 votes. PM Theresa May quelled dissent by calling Conservative rebels into her office shortly before the vote and personally assuring them of a bigger say for MPs if she fails to reach a deal, and that she would spell out more details by the end of this week.

Peers could reinstate their plan when the Bill returns to the House of Lords, giving rebel MPs a second chance to hold May to account.

MPs also won a concession from the government that there would be no physical checks at the Northern Irish border.

Several MPs expressed anger at the lack of time allowed for debate, with Scottish Labour and SNP MPs particularly enraged that a mere 15 minutes were given to the subject of devolution.

An amendment to remove the date of exit from the Bill was defeated and the original date, 29 March 2019, reinstated.

Ahead of the debate, Justice Minister Phillip Lee resigned his office to vote against the government.

MPs were due to vote on amendments relating to membership of the single market and the customs union, on the second day of the debate, at the time of going to press.

Rosling King senior partner, Georgina Squire said: ‘After Brexit, we face considerable legal uncertainty—not only as to how our court system will be used, but also the laws it will enforce.

‘It can boil down to practicalities such as buying a car directly from an EU manufacturer after Brexit, which is faulty. Where does the recourse lie? Parliament is debating broad issues, but the details will affect us all every day and are far reaching.’

Issue: 7797 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll