header-logo header-logo

Breaking through

11 September 2009 / Martin Baldock
Issue: 7384 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Martin Baldock explains how a forensic expert cuts through electronic “fog”

Judges, counsel and board-level decision makers could be forgiven for being bewildered by experts telling them what can or cannot be done with technology. The pace of IT development is such that it is easy to be hoodwinked.

In a court of law this IT “innocence” becomes critical as those involved in cases and those hearing them risk falling victim to tactical assertions about electronic evidence.

Electronic evidence is increasingly at the heart of litigation today. This e-evidence can be gathered from desktop and laptop computers, mobile phones, BlackBerrys and even satellite navigation systems.

UK courts are beginning to experience the kind of tactical use of electronic evidence long seen in US courts with counsel arguing that information cannot be recovered or that, given the estimated value of the case being heard, it is not worth the expense involved in taking the e-disclosure process to another level.

This is where the evidence of the forensic expert witness becomes essential in cutting through obfuscation to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll