header-logo header-logo

Breaking point in Luxembourg

14 July 2011 / Emmanuel Guinchard
Issue: 7474 / Categories: Features , EU
printer mail-detail

Emmanuel Guinchard forecasts breaking point in Luxembourg

The 2010 Annual Report of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) paints a bleak reality for two of its three courts—the Court of Justice and the General Court.

In 2010, the number of cases brought before the Court of Justice was the highest in its history. For several reasons, including the impact of the Lisbon Treaty, the number of new cases will continue to increase in the years to come. As a consequence, the court is facing an imminent workload crisis.

The General Court is already overloaded. In 2010, the average duration of proceedings before the General Court was nearly 25 months and the number of new cases continued to exceed that of completed cases. In contrast, the third legal arena of the CJEU, the Civil Service Tribunal, is a success story—even if the latest figures for 2010 reveal a slight deterioration in its performance.

In the light of the forthcoming (Court of Justice) or existing (General Court) workload crisis, the recent publication

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll