header-logo header-logo

Breaking down the bill

23 June 2023 / Masood Ahmed , Lal Akhter
Issue: 8030 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs , Fees , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail
127500
Agency fees or expert fees? Masood Ahmed & Lal Akhter clarify the rules surrounding fees paid to a medical reporting organisation when assessing costs
  • As part of the costs assessment process, the courts will expect the receiving party to provide a clear breakdown of the fees of any medical reporting agency instructed to provide expert reports.
  • A failure to provide a breakdown may result in the receiving party not recovering that element of their costs.
  • The decision in Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust v Luke Hoskin may impact more widely on the practice of agencies providing other expert services.

The issue which came before Judge Bird in Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust v Luke Hoskin (Administrator of the Estate of Pippa Hoskin (deceased)) (County Court at Manchester, on appeal) (22 May 2023) was this: is a receiving party (ie the party being paid its costs) required to provide a breakdown in its bill of costs between the cost of an expert’s report and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll