header-logo header-logo

01 February 2023
Issue: 8011 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Contempt
printer mail-detail

Breach of judgment embargo

A US deputy general counsel who breached the embargo on disclosure of draft judgments has escaped contempt proceedings.

While Lord Justice Warby acknowledged there was an argument that strict liability might apply, he chose to take no action since ‘further proceedings would be disproportionate to any need to uphold the court's authority’, in InterDigital Technology v Lenovo [2023] EWCA Civ 57. Lord Justice Birss and Lady Justice Falk agreed.

InterDigital counsel Steve Akerley, on holiday at the time, read the draft judgment on a mobile device and disclosed the outcome to the company’s US law firm under the heading ‘confidential’. 

The email was then forwarded to five team members, one of whom congratulated InterDigital’s solicitor Gowling partner Alexandra Brodie, who immediately replied: 'Thank you but unfortunately that is a breach of the embargo. Who else did he tell?'

Last February, Sir Geoffrey Vos MR warned that those who breach embargoes should expect to face contempt proceedings, in R (on the application of Counsel General for Wales) v Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy [2022] EWCA Civ 181.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll