header-logo header-logo

04 September 2024
Issue: 8084 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Equality
printer mail-detail

Boosting equality should be Bar priority

Barristers would have a professional obligation to advance equality, diversity & inclusion (EDI), under proposals to amend regulations

The change to the wording of Core Duty 8 would replace the current duty not to discriminate unlawfully.

A Bar Standards Board (BSB) ‘Consultation on the proposed amendments to the equality rule’, launched this week, states: ‘In order to achieve the culture change needed, we believe the duty needs to go further.

‘We believe it should be a core expectation of all practising barristers that they demonstrate an appropriate commitment, through their practice, to equality, diversity and inclusion.’

The BSB also proposes moving to outcomes-based regulation of equality rules.

Sam Townend KC, chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘While much progress has been made—thanks to the work of individuals, chambers, Inns, Specialist Bar Associations and others—there is clearly much more to be done.

‘Much of the progress made on EDI in chambers is thanks to the voluntary work of EDOs [equality and diversity officers] and we are keen to make sure that any regulatory changes do not undermine that work. Radical change is certainly disruptive and may have unintended detrimental consequences.  

‘On the proposals to move to outcomes-based regulation, we have previously raised concerns that this could pose significant challenges for the Bar and may be ineffective.’

The BSB previously proposed outcomes-based regulation in October 2023, ‘Consultation on the regulation of barristers in chambers’. Responding in February, the Bar Council warned this would pose ‘significant challenges’.

It said: ‘Barristers, generally, work long hours in an intellectually demanding job. Reading, considering and understanding outcomes, then devising ways to achieve them, is not a task that they have time or incentive to carry out.’

Issue: 8084 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Equality
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll