header-logo header-logo

05 June 2019
Issue: 7843 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Boost for UK LawTech

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has committed more than £2m to support new and emerging technologies in the legal sector

The LawTech Delivery Panel, a group of industry experts and members of the government and judiciary, is likely to play a key role in allocating the funding. The panel was established by the Lord Chancellor a year ago to champion the use of technology in the legal sector. It aims to foster innovation, identify and help overcome barriers to growth and provide direction to the legal sector.

Several of the global firms such as Allen & Overy and Clifford Chance have embraced LawTech to the extent of setting up their own technology innovation centres.

Justice secretary David Gauke, said technology ‘promises to be a key component in the success of our legal services sector.

‘We are home to some of the best law firms in the world, globally renowned courts and a wealth of legal talent. Through the effective use of technology, we can help the sector advance and continue to lead globally.

‘More than 200 international firms, from more than 40 jurisdictions, have chosen to base themselves here and English and Welsh law is the most commonly used in international business and dispute resolution.’

In 2017, the UK legal sector was worth about £25bn to the economy and employed more than 300,000 people. It is the second largest legal services market in the world. The LawTech sector was valued at $15.9bn globally in 2018, the MoJ said.

Welcoming the announcement, Christina Blacklaws, Law Society president and chair of the LawTech Delivery Panel, said: ‘There has been an exponential growth of technology in the financial services industry in recent years, thanks in no small part to government support.

‘Last year, job creation increased in London by 61%―and nearly a fifth in the country as a whole. This initiative will help the UK to become a world leader in legal technology―with all of the economic benefits that follow.’

Issue: 7843 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll