header-logo header-logo

A bit of common sense?

07 August 2015 / Samantha Ewing
Issue: 7664 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
nlj_7664_ewing

Samantha Ewing considers the benefits of mediation in will disputes

How many practitioners have heard their client talk of the “principle of the matter” when dealing with will disputes? Too often clients proclaim confidently: “I don’t care about the cost, I want to see him in court!” However, litigation solicitors know all too well that clients care about the costs a great deal at the end of the matter, as do the courts and such an attitude is very costly.

Benefits of mediation

Mediation can be very stressful for the client. In particularly acrimonious family disputes, the thought of facing the other side can be too much for some to bear. Despite this, clients should always be encouraged to attend mediation (provided it is suitable to do so, see below) as it:

  • is cheaper for clients than a full trial, which will help to preserve the value of the estate for the family;
  • offers flexibility on the terms of settlement that can be agreed; and
  • potentially allows both sides to walk away with
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll