header-logo header-logo

Bill of costs: appeal dismissed!

08 July 2022 / Laura Rees
Issue: 7986 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail
87142
Fee earners could risk failing to have their bills assessed if the right fee earner information is not provided, says Laura Rees
  • Court of Appeal judgment in AKC v Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust [2022] EWCA Civ 630 is a blow to firms who use a team approach and have multiple fee earners conducting a case.
  • Bills must be drafted with all the requisite fee earner information.
  • Those that draft bills must have a deep understanding of the functionality of how a bill works, as leaving codes/details blank may mean that the summary sheets within the bill are unreliable.

Lord Justice Newey provided the leading judgment in AKC v Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust [2022] EWCA Civ 630, dismissing the claimant’s appeal and concluding that the claimant must provide more information in relation to the fee earner’s SCCO grade and status in both paper and electronic bills.

The claimant made a clinical negligence claim against the defendant in respect

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll