header-logo header-logo

Big data, big problems

14 March 2014 / Ramin Tabatabai , Mike Brown
Issue: 7598 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail
web_brown_tabatabai

As the risks of handling big data grow, information governance is an important legal & technical issue, say Mike Brown & Ramin Tabatabai

Businesses are under scrutiny like never before. Whether it’s a call from the regulator, investigations under the UK Bribery Act 2010 or the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act 1977 (FCPA) or press reports of customer data being stolen, the financial and reputational risks that companies face are growing exponentially. Recent months have seen customer details stolen by cyber criminals and large corporations being investigated for alleged FCPA breaches. Meanwhile, the EU is threatening to “blacklist” companies found guilty of corruption offences.

In this environment, the need for companies to be in control of their data is greater than ever. Good information governance is critical to preventing, identifying and mitigating these risks, but many companies struggle to prepare themselves, leaving them vulnerable to serious financial and reputational damage.

Delivering data management

The essence of effective data management is three-fold: the prevention and identification of potential problems, the rapid reporting

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll