header-logo header-logo

A better way

31 March 2011 / Tony Guise
Issue: 7459 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Tony Guise welcomes the advent of COLPs & COFAs

The changes which alternative business structures (ABSs) will bring about in the market for the delivery of legal services and to those firms who may not even be considering entering into an ABS remain the stuff of conjecture and nightmare-scenarios abound. However, there is a more tangible change taking place on 6 October 2011 to the way all legal service providers will be required to operate in the future.

The new Solicitors Regualtion Authority (SRA) handbook, which comes into force on 6 October requires both ABSs and solicitors firms to appoint a compliance officer for legal practice (COLP) and a compliance officer for finance and administration (COFA) in order to become authorised. What will the implications of these new roles be and what effect are they likely to have upon the regulated community? Both are creations of the Legal Services Act 2007, where they  have the name head of legal practice and head of legal compliance—the SRA has changed the titles and extended the requirement to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll