header-logo header-logo

23 March 2020
Categories: Legal News , Health & safety
printer mail-detail

Bereavement damages reform

Lawyers have been asked for their views on a draft Remedial Order to extend bereavement damages to co-habiting couples
Currently, under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976, bereavement damages are only available to the spouse or civil partner of the deceased, or, where the deceased is an unmarried and unpartnered minor, to their parents or, where the deceased is ‘not a legitimate’ minor, to their mother.

In 2017, the Court of Appeal held the Act incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights as it denied bereavement damages to co-habiting partners who had been living together for at least two years before one of the partners died, in Smith v Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2017] EWCA Civ 1916.

The government laid the draft Fatal Accidents Act 1976 (Remedial) Order 2020 remedying the incompatibility on 12 February. It proposes to make bereavement damages available to co-habitants who lived with the deceased for at least two years prior to the death, and, where the deceased is separated but not divorced, to divide the award equally between the cohabitant and spouse.

The Joint Committee on Human Rights has to report to Parliament on whether the draft Order should be approved. It invites submissions from interested parties of no more than 1,500 words by 3 April.

To respond please visit: https://bit.ly/3bijby4

Categories: Legal News , Health & safety
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll