header-logo header-logo

Beer war comes to a head

28 September 2011
Issue: 7483 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Two drinks giants must share a trademark in the UK, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has ruled

Anheuser-Busch, which makes US Budweiser beer, has lost its attempt to legally force its Czech rival Budějovický Budvar to stop using the “Budweiser” name in the UK.

In 2000, both companies were given permission by the Court of Appeal to simultaneously register the trademark as they had a long-standing and honest history of co-existence in the UK market.

That changed in 2005, when Anheuser-Busch started legal action to invalidate their rival’s use of the trademark on the grounds that their 1976 registration predates Budvar’s 1989 application. The Court of Appeal sought clarification from the ECJ, which last week ruled in Budvar’s favour.

Mark Blair, partner at Marks & Clerk Solicitors, which acted for Budvar, said: “The two brands have co-existed in the UK for decades, differing in taste, price, and get up.

“The identical nature of the ‘Budweiser’ marks is an honest, historical co-incidence, and causes no significant confusion amongst UK consumers.This is effectively a very strong endorsement from the [ECJ] of Budvar’s right to the ‘Budweiser’ name in the UK, and of the underlying principles of trademark law in general—it sends a clear message that you cannot simply cancel a trademark that has been used for 30 plus years in good faith.”

Issue: 7483 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll