header-logo header-logo

Beer war comes to a head

28 September 2011
Issue: 7483 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Two drinks giants must share a trademark in the UK, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has ruled

Anheuser-Busch, which makes US Budweiser beer, has lost its attempt to legally force its Czech rival Budějovický Budvar to stop using the “Budweiser” name in the UK.

In 2000, both companies were given permission by the Court of Appeal to simultaneously register the trademark as they had a long-standing and honest history of co-existence in the UK market.

That changed in 2005, when Anheuser-Busch started legal action to invalidate their rival’s use of the trademark on the grounds that their 1976 registration predates Budvar’s 1989 application. The Court of Appeal sought clarification from the ECJ, which last week ruled in Budvar’s favour.

Mark Blair, partner at Marks & Clerk Solicitors, which acted for Budvar, said: “The two brands have co-existed in the UK for decades, differing in taste, price, and get up.

“The identical nature of the ‘Budweiser’ marks is an honest, historical co-incidence, and causes no significant confusion amongst UK consumers.This is effectively a very strong endorsement from the [ECJ] of Budvar’s right to the ‘Budweiser’ name in the UK, and of the underlying principles of trademark law in general—it sends a clear message that you cannot simply cancel a trademark that has been used for 30 plus years in good faith.”

Issue: 7483 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll