header-logo header-logo

31 May 2018
Issue: 7795 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

BC reports on a tale of two Bars

nlj_7795_news

Survey paints mixed picture of a barrister’s working life

A barrister’s life is a stressful one, according to a Bar Council report.

More than 4,000 barristers responded to a survey for the report, published last week, Barristers’ Working Lives 2017: Barristers’ attitudes towards their working lives. It reveals a picture of barristers struggling with a heavy workload, stress and a poor work-life balance. Barristers routinely work the equivalent of one or two days per week unpaid, while funding cuts are causing one in three criminal barristers to rethink their choice of career.

However, the report also tells a tale of two Bars—the emotionally drained and underpaid Criminal Bar, 62% of whom work at least one day a week unpaid; and the more positive Commercial and Chancery Bar.

Moreover, despite all the stress, 89% of barristers find their work interesting and 61% of barristers across all practice areas agreed that they feel enthusiastic about their work most days.

In terms of hours, 27% of criminal barristers and 33% of family barristers work more than 60 hours a week, compared to 16% in commercial and chancery, 17% in civil and an average of 22% across all practice areas, which is up from 13% in 2013.

Across the Bar, only 26% said they were not under too much work pressure (compared to 33% in 2013). 58% of criminal barristers and 66% of family barristers felt they were under too much work pressure.

Andrew Walker QC, Chair of the Bar, said: ‘There is a notable difference between those practising in crime (and, to a degree, in family work) and the rest of the Bar. 

‘It should also be recognised that the survey was conducted in the summer of 2017, since when legal aid fees have been eroded further by inflation. The fact that many saw their workload, stress and work-life balance deteriorate yet further between 2013 and 2017 is a worrying trend. 

‘It shows that we must all maintain our efforts across the Bar to support those who are finding practice ever more difficult to sustain, both financially and in terms of maintaining and enjoying a healthy and fulfilling life both at work and at home.’

Issue: 7795 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll