header-logo header-logo

Barristers on strike

01 July 2022
Issue: 7985 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail
Hundreds of fully robed barristers gathered outside the Old Bailey with placards this week, as the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) strike action began

Criminal barristers also protested outside Birmingham, Manchester, Leeds, Bristol and Cardiff Crown Courts, bringing work at all six courts to a halt. The barristers are refusing to take on new cases and continuing to ‘refuse returns’―the initial protest action they began two months ago.

Addressing the wigged and gowned crowd outside the Old Bailey, Criminal Bar Association (CBA) chair Jo Sidhu QC said: ‘Last year we lost another 300 criminal barristers. Why? Because they could not do this job any more on what they were being paid and for the hours that they were toiling.

‘This must come to an end, and it will if this government is prepared to sit down with us and negotiate. We cannot continue to work like this.’

The scale of the walkouts will escalate by an extra day each week until, by late July, full ‘weeks of action’ are taking place on alternative weeks.

The CBA is asking for a 25% increase in legal aid fees and wants the government to ‘at least’ implement with immediate application to ongoing cases the minimum 15% increase recommended by Sir Christopher Bellamy’s criminal legal aid review.

Justice Secretary Dominic Raab, in a tweeted statement, condemned the strike as ‘regrettable… given only 43.5% of their members voted for this particular, most disruptive, option’, and urged them to ‘agree the proposed 15% pay rise which would see a typical barrister earn £7,000 more a year’.

However, the CBA has pointed out the increase, which would apply to cases beginning from October, would not reach barristers’ pockets until late 2023/2024, as fees are paid on completion of the case. Among junior barristers, median earnings are £12,200.

A total of 2,055 criminal barristers voted in a Criminal Bar Association (CBA) ballot. The results, announced last week, show 81.5% (1,675 barristers) supported days of action, of which 43.5% of the total (894 barristers) chose the most disruptive option (days of action combined with ‘no returns’ and refusing new instructions).
Issue: 7985 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll