header-logo header-logo

15 July 2022
Issue: 7987 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Barrister psychometric tests to end

Divided opinions over fairness to students

The Bar Course Aptitude Test (BCAT) is to be scrapped from 31 July because it ‘no longer… serves a useful purpose’, the Bar Standards Board (BSB) has confirmed.

However, the Bar Council reiterated its concerns that scrapping the BCAT will lead to increasing numbers of students paying to complete courses with little or no prospect of achieving a successful career at the Bar.

The Legal Services Board has approved the BSB’s application to end the Test, which costs students £150 and was introduced as a prerequisite for vocational training as a barrister in 2013 when high numbers of students were failing the Bar course. The Test was intended to filter students for aptitude. It is a computerised 55-minute test with 60 multiple choice questions, based on a Watson-Glaser psychometric test of critical thinking and understanding of arguments, identifying different perspectives, and distinguishing facts from opinions and assumptions.

BSB director general, Mark Neale, said: ‘Bar training providers must comply fully with the requirements of the Authorisation Framework when selecting their students, and that includes their obligations to maintain high standards and to promote accessibility.

‘We shall continue to monitor providers carefully to ensure that their own selection of students is fair and rigorous.’

However, Mark Fenhalls QC, Chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘The problem of too many students wasting money embarking on courses they will struggle to pass is on the rise again.

‘We fully support the aims of making sure the Bar is accessible to people from all backgrounds and so we are disappointed that the decision to scrap the BCAT has been made without putting robust alternative provisions in place.’

In its response to the September 2021 BSB consultation on the future of the BCAT, the Bar Council highlighted the ‘reasonably good correlation between BCAT mark and degree of success on the BPTC’.

Issue: 7987 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll