header-logo header-logo

17 November 2021
Issue: 7957 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Technology
printer mail-detail

Barriers to AI in commercial property

Commercial property lawyers are keen to adopt AI (artificial intelligence) or automation software but have encountered a series of obstacles, research has found

A study by due diligence software provider SearchFlow found 95% of law firms said the pandemic has accelerated their digitisation strategies, and 71% of senior real estate lawyers agreed digitising aspects of the legal process would give their firms a competitive advantage or market differentiation. The report, Commercial real estate lawyers of the future, published last week, also found 64% of firms have a digitisation roadmap already in place or in progress.  

However, some lawyers said they are struggling when it comes to integrating AI or automation. More than half the lawyers complained the fast-moving pace of technology made it difficult to scope what was required, while 43% found the technology too expensive and were having difficulty aligning budgets, and 40% of the lawyers cited change management as a potential obstacle, suggesting training, changing mindsets and incorporating change in day-to-day processes are hurdles that need to be overcome.

Others expressed concern about risk management―nearly half the lawyers believed increased use of automation in due diligence processes would increase their firm’s exposure to risk.

Dr Thomas Quirke, managing director of SearchFlow, said: ‘Looking into the future, while various barriers to AI adoption have been cited and represent the clear market challenge, there is a consensus that the use of more data driven processes and automation will play their part in enhancing the real estate transaction process.

‘Some 60% agreed that greater digitisation will enable lawyers to evolve their roles or upskill, as fewer manual interventions will be required. By 2025, a majority agree that technology adoption will lead to faster completions, overall better decision-making and a reduction in administrative steps, meaning practitioners can focus on progressing deals, removing human error and managing risk.’

Issue: 7957 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Technology
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll