header-logo header-logo

Baroness Hale: a life of firsts

30 November 2017
Issue: 7772 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lady Hale’s pupil-master told her he didn’t approve of women at the Bar because ‘they don’t know how to fight’ and are ‘either too stubborn or too yielding’, she has revealed in a film on her life.

The barrister, whose wife was a doctor, told Lady Hale, now President of the Supreme Court, that medicine is a caring profession and women should be carers, but the Bar is a ‘fighting profession’ where practitioners have to have the judgement to know ‘what to fight, how to fight and what to settle’.

She recalls: ‘He was wrong about the stereotyping of women but he was right about the Bar.’

The film, which was sponsored by LexisNexis and launched last week in the Supreme Court, was made as part of the First 100 Years project, which tells the story of women in law.

Lady Hale said the ‘proudest day’ of her entire professional life was when she was sworn in as ‘the first and, regrettably, only woman ever’ Law Lord at the House of Lords. 

Issue: 7772 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll