header-logo header-logo

10 May 2024
Categories: Legal News , Pro Bono , Profession
printer mail-detail

Bar Pro Bono Awards: winners

The winners of Advocate’s 2024 Bar Pro Bono Awards, sponsored by LexisNexis, have been announced

The winners are:

  • Young Pro Bono Barrister of the Year: Tinessa Kaur of 4BB Chambers
  • Junior Pro Bono Barrister of the Year: Jake Rudman of Hatton Chambers and Jennifer MacLeod of Brick Court Chambers (joint winners)
  • Pro Bono KC of the Year: Samantha Hillas KC of St John’s Buildings
  • International Pro Bono Barrister of the year: Haydee Dijkstal of 33 Bedford Row
  • Pro Bono Chambers’ Professional of the Year: Mark Ronson of Kings Chambers
  • Pro Bono and Social Responsibility Initiative of the Year: Dads House
  • John Collins Pro Bono Excellence Award: Joseph Sinclair of Mountford Chambers
  • Pro Bono Chambers of the Year Award: 4PB

Since 1997, the awards have recognised the bar’s pro bono contributions. They commend individuals and chambers for their dedication to providing pro bono services, widening access to justice for people across England and Wales.

This was the biggest year so far for the awards, with more than 100 nominations received in total, which can all be seen on Advocate’s website, as well as the list of judges.

Advocate is a charity that finds free legal assistance from volunteer barristers across England and Wales. It matches members of the public who need free legal help with barristers who are willing to donate their time and expertise in deserving cases to those who are unable to obtain legal aid and cannot afford to pay.

Bar Council chair Sam Townend KC, on the judging panel, said: ‘The brilliant award ceremony was fantastically well attended. This reflects the support that the bar gives to the important work of Advocate in achieving access to justice for thousands each year.’

The awards took place on 8 May at Middle Temple Hall, London.

Categories: Legal News , Pro Bono , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll