header-logo header-logo

16 November 2022
Issue: 8003 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Bar pleads: no more budget cuts

Budget cuts, LASPO’s ten-year legacy and recent political decisions have devastated access to justice, according to a major piece of research by the Bar Council.

The report, ‘Access denied: the state of the justice system in England and Wales in 2022’, paints a worrying picture in which 239 court closures since 2010 have left low-income clients unable to afford travel fares to their hearings, while many remaining courts are in crumbling buildings with leaks and infestations and even without basic facilities.

Meanwhile, LASPO (the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012) ‘significantly’ restricted access to civil legal aid and the subsequent increase in litigants in person has resulted in cases taking longer and costing more. The Bar Council report highlights that litigants have had a ‘mixed experience’ of remote justice, which requires further investigation.

It also found barristers are diversifying away from legal aid work due to workload pressures and poor remuneration, further reducing the capacity of the system. Moreover, political attacks on the rule of law and anti-lawyer rhetoric are undermining confidence in the justice system.

The report combines data from the Bar Council’s Access to Justice dashboard with testimony from barristers and other practitioners who took part in a Justice Week workshop earlier this year.

Mark Fenhalls KC, chair of the Bar, said: ‘Through the evidence presented in this report, we make a special pleading that access to justice is properly recognised as a necessary pillar of a fair and just society.

‘The improved funding that has been available in the last two years cannot now be reversed without causing irrevocable damage to this vital public service. The consequences of cuts are not only a failing system, but one that ultimately costs more—both in terms of money and in human terms. The government must commit to long-term planning and resourcing of the system.’

Issue: 8003 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll