header-logo header-logo

Bar complaints-handling system faces overhaul

03 January 2008
Issue: 7302 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Legal Services

The complaints-handling regime against barristers looks set for a major overhaul following the launch of a consultation on the process by the Bar Standards Board (BSB). Views are being sought on significant changes to the way complaints about barristers, and any subsequent disciplinary proceedings, are handled. These include the introduction of the concept of “improper behaviour” towards non-clients and a new process to speed the disposal of cases where the barrister is prepared to agree to the outcome of a complaint. Plans to extend the complaints commissioner’s powers, to allow him to make recommendations for the disposal of complaints that do not require disciplinary action, are also outlined.

The consultation, Complaints and Disciplinary Processes, follows the publication last July of a strategic review by complaints commissioner Rob Behrens, of the Bar’s complaints and disciplinary processes, in which he said the current system was in need of significant improvement and made 52 recommendations for change.

Ruth Evans, BSB chairman, says: “The proposals are designed to ensure that the complaints and disciplinary system is fair and effective.

The changes should improve the speed and efficiency of the system and, also, increase the confidence and satisfaction of consumers and barristers in the system.” The consultation paper can be downloaded at www.barstandardsboard.org.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll