header-logo header-logo

Banker can’t lord it over villagers

17 October 2013
Issue: 7580 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Owner of Over Hall loses title but keeps his land in Court of Appeal battle

A “Lord of the Manor” has lost his title but held his land after a dispute with villagers.

Former banker Peter Burton and his partner bought Over Hall, a dilapidated 17th century manor house in Lancashire, near the village of Ireby. 

Burton purchased the title, Lordship of the Manor of Ireby, for £1 after discovering its existence among old title deeds. He then sought to register ownership of 360 acres of Ireby Fell, registered common land nearby, which he believed belonged to the title holder.

In 2005, the Land Registry confirmed the Burtons’ ownership of the Fell and they began to exert authority over the area, putting up a gate and fencing, asking locals not to park on the land and letting out shooting and grazing rights. This strained relations between the couple and local villagers.

Five local residents brought a legal challenge. They relied on a 1254 charter of King Henry III, which granted land to the Knights Hospitaller of St John of Jerusalem, and later historical records from the Tudor period through to the present day.

In 2010, the Land Registry held that the manorial title had lapsed but the couple were the proprietors of the land. 

The residents contended that since the couple did not have the title they should not have the land.

However, the Court of Appeal this week upheld an earlier High Court ruling in favour of the Burtons.

Lord Justice Mummery, giving the lead judgment in Walker v Burton [2013] EWCA Civ 1228, said that while the 14 lever arch files of historical materials were “interesting. Very little of it is of direct legal relevance”.

Dismissing the five local residents’ appeal, he said there was “no prospect” of anyone other than the Burtons being registered as proprietors of the Fell, since the appellants made no claim and the Crown showed no sign of asserting its right to the title. 

“It was a relevant consideration that the Fell should be owned by someone rather than left in limbo with continuing uncertainty about title to it,” he said. Moreover, the Burtons “had invested time, effort and money on improving the Fell and its management”.

 

Issue: 7580 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll