header-logo header-logo

05 March 2025
Issue: 8107 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Backlog report highlights shocking impacts of Crown Court delays

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) appears to have ‘simply accepted’ Crown Court backlogs will continue to grow rather than taking the urgent action required, the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has warned.

In a devastating report this week, PAC—one of Parliament’s most influential committees—highlighted the impact of the delays and urged the government to act now rather than waiting for Sir Brian Leveson’s independent review of the criminal courts to report in the autumn.

PAC’s chair, Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown MP, said it was ‘disappointing’ the backlog is at a record high of 73,000, compared to a record low of 33,290 in March 2019 pre-COVID.

‘Victims of rape and serious sexual offences (RASSO) can wait for three years or more for these cases to come to trial,’ he said. ‘In 2024, 59% of victims of adult rape dropped out of the justice system because research shows they could not bear the trauma any longer.

‘The remand population has almost doubled from 9,602 in 2018 to 17,600 in September 2024 (20% of the entire prison population). 770 prisoners have been on remand for over two years. These are shocking statistics involving sometimes innocent people which should be carefully scrutinised to see how the system could be improved’.

The report, ‘Crown Court backlogs’, noted more than a third (35%) of prisoners on remand in 2022 did not ultimately receive a custodial sentence, including 13% who were acquitted entirely. It urged the Lord Chancellor and Lady Chief Justice to look for ways to reduce remand numbers to 2019 levels, freeing up 8,000 prison places.

It recommended the MoJ and judiciary try to reduce the number of on-the-day postponements of hearings in serious sexual and violent cases, which are highly distressing for victims, and to protect funding for victim support services.

It also expressed concern that one in four trials fail to take place on their scheduled date (ineffective trials) compared to about 15% of trials pre-pandemic. It noted some of these delays would be ‘straightforward to resolve’: for example, building maintenance issues, poor case preparation, or where remand prisoners arrive late at court.

Issue: 8107 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll