header-logo header-logo

12 April 2013 / Malcolm Dowden
Issue: 7555 / Categories: Opinion , Judicial review
printer mail-detail

Back on track?

Malcolm Dowden follows the latest disputes surrounding the HS2 rail link

The government has announced the routes for both phases of the HS2 rail link, and succeeded on nine points out of the 10 decided at judicial review in R (Buckinghamshire) v Secretary of State [2013] EWHC 481 (Admin), [2013] All ER (D) 185 (Mar). The court found that the government’s consultation on compensation issues had been inadequate. The government is revisiting that issue rather than appealing the decision, considering that a renewed consultation would be more cost and time-effective. Nonetheless, the project has a long way to go. Even if there are no legislative delays trains will not run along the London to Birmingham section until 2026. While legislation is pending, and as construction proceeds, there is significant scope for disputes over compulsory purchase, compensation and land access rights.

Freedom of information

Protesters have already turned to the law on grounds other than those covered in the judicial review. A Staffordshire protest group has obtained an order requiring HS2 to disclose its criteria

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll