header-logo header-logo

09 April 2009 / Cristian Ley
Issue: 7364 / Categories: Features , Tax , Employment
printer mail-detail

Back to the future?

Cristian Ley welcomes the biggest political U-turn since the poll tax

When the government introduced the statutory dispute resolution procedures in October 2004 the aim was to provide a means for problems to be raised and discussed in the workplace and in some cases remove the need to resort to employment tribunals. However, as we all know, even the best laid plans do not always work out as one intends and in 2006 the government asked Michael Gibbons—former chairman of DTI Employment law simplification panel—to review the operation of the procedures and make recommendations for their reform and/or repeal.

Gibbons found that the statutory dispute resolution procedures had significant unintended negative consequences which outweighed any benefits they carried in terms of resolving workplace disputes. This report concluded that the statutory dispute procedures should be repealed, which they were on 6 April 2009 by virtue of the Employment Act 2008.
What replaces the statutory grievance, disciplinary and dismissal procedures?

The revised Acas Code of Practice (the code) will govern grievances, disciplinary proceedings and dismissals

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll