header-logo header-logo

Back to the drawing board?

27 May 2010 / Nicola Mcleod , Eoin O’Shea , Alex Beal
Issue: 7419 / Categories: Features , Regulatory , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Eoin O’Shea, Nicola McLeod & Alex Beal say the SFO will have to reconsider penalties for bribery

The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) published guidance entitled, Approach of the Serious Fraud Office to Dealing with Overseas Corruption, on 21 July 2009. The guidance encourages self-reporting of corruption offences by corporate entities. It provides for the possibility of a “global settlement” with the SFO where liability arises in another jurisdiction, and makes plain the SFO’s willingness to negotiate on the subject of penalties. It also makes plain that in the right circumstances (such as self-reporting and co-operation with the SFO’s investigation, as well as a commitment to reform of corporate practices and procedures) the SFO would recommend that only civil penalties be imposed (pursuant to its powers under Pt 5 of the Proceeds of Crime Act).

On the other hand, the guidance makes clear that, in the absence of cooperation and self-reporting, companies paying bribes should not expect leniency. The chances of a criminal prosecution are increased. The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll