header-logo header-logo

BAA dominance under pressure

16 August 2007
Issue: 7286 / Categories: Legal News , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-detail

News

BAA could be forced to get rid of at least one of its airports to ensure standards are raised at the ones it retains, as a result of the Competition Commission’s (CC’s) investigation into the supply of airport services by BAA in the UK.

The Office of Fair Trading made the reference to the CC in March. The CC will now determine whether or not there are any features of the market that prevent, restrict or distort competition and, if so, what remedial action might be taken. BAA owns seven airports: Heathrow, Gatwick, Stansted and Southampton in England; and Edinburgh, Glasgow and Aberdeen in Scotland.

Tom Morrison, an associate at Rollits Solicitors, says the investigation has come about largely as a result of the level of complaints about the standard and availability of facilities at BAA’s airports, most notably at Heathrow, coupled with the belief among many that operational and capacity issues would be addressed quicker and more effectively by an owner which was facing competition from neighbouring airports. 

“One of the outcomes of the investigation could well be that BAA is forced to divest of one or more of its airports in the hope that standards at the retained and divested airports will be raised as a result of having to compete for airlines and travellers’ business,” he says.

BAA, he adds, does not deny there are problems, but puts the blame on planning and other regulatory issues. “Whether BAA would put more time, effort and money into overcoming those issues if it faced competition from rival airport operators is something which should become apparent once this investigation has been completed. While we cannot pre-judge the outcome, common sense would seem to indicate that it is not healthy for one airport operator to have such dominance over the handling of flights in the south east,” he says.

Issue: 7286 / Categories: Legal News , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll