header-logo header-logo

30 October 2024
Issue: 8092 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory , Fraud
printer mail-detail

Axiom Ince review lays blame on SRA

The Legal Services Board (LSB) has initiated enforcement action against the solicitors’ regulator over its handling of Axiom Ince Limited

Axiom Ince Limited closed in October 2023 with the loss of 1,400 jobs and approximately £60m client money missing. In November 2023, the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) launched an investigation into the firm, arresting seven individuals in dawn raids across the South East of England.

An LSB-commissioned independent review by Northern Ireland firm Carson McDowell into the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s (SRA) actions before it closed Axiom Ince has found the SRA ‘did not act adequately, effectively and efficiently’.

The review, published this week, concluded the SRA did not take all the steps it could or should have taken, and its ‘actions and omissions in this matter necessitate change in its procedures to mitigate the possibility of a similar situation arising again’.

Alan Kershaw, LSB chair, said: ‘The Axiom Ince case has caused significant consumer detriment.’

The LSB Board is now initiating the process to set directions under s 32 of the Legal Services Act 2007, requiring the SRA to make changes to better achieve its regulatory objectives.

However, Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: ‘At the heart of this issue is a suspected complex and well-hidden fraud carried out by a solicitor, with an ongoing criminal investigation by the SFO.

‘The report recognises our “excellent work” in uncovering the suspected fraud. But there are things we could have done better. We moved quickly last year to tighten up some of our processes.

‘There is a lot in the report that we don’t agree with, and we don’t understand the basis for enforcement action. We will be consulting soon on changes to better protect clients’ money. This will include exploring the more radical solution of whether we should stop law firms holding client money.’

Law Society president Richard Atkinson said: ‘While the events leading to Axiom’s collapse were happening, the SRA was focused on increasing its fining powers and proposing regulatory expansion rather than tackling the known risks from accumulator style firms and ensuring its operations were joined up and laser focused on protecting consumers.’

Issue: 8092 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory , Fraud
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll