header-logo header-logo

08 December 2017 / David Burrows
Issue: 7773 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Assessment matters

nlj_7773_burrows

David Burrows presents a master class in child understanding & capacity

  • Assessment of a child’s understanding is complementary to law in relation to understanding under Mental Capacity Act 2005.
  • Gillick remains the basis for assessment of understanding.
  • Understanding is issue-specific: it must be tested according to the issue in hand and with all age-appropriate information available.

In Re S (Child as Parent: Adoption: Consent) [2017] EWHC 2729 (Fam) Cobb J sets out the legal framework for professional assessment of understanding of the process and effect of adoption for a mother, S, who is ‘under 16 years of age’. She suffers from ‘developmental delay and learning difficulties’ ([2]). She has not seen her child T whom she wants adopted. ‘Child’ is defined as a person not yet 18 (Children Act 1989 (CA 1989), s 105(1)), though this article is concerned mostly with a child of under 16.

The case is of significance more widely than to capacity and adoption. It reviews the question of understanding and Gillick -competence in children proceedings generally, though

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll