header-logo header-logo

26 June 2024
Issue: 8077 / Categories: Legal News , Extradition , International
printer mail-detail

Assange saga finally ends in Saipan

Julian Assange, WikiLeaks founder, has agreed a deal with the US authorities where he will plead guilty this week to a single espionage charge in the US District Court in Saipan, after which the US will drop its extradition request

Saipan, in the Northern Mariana Islands, is a US commonwealth island in the western Pacific. Assange is expected to return to his native Australia after the hearing.

Assange faced 18 charges in the US for publishing classified files on the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. He has been imprisoned in the UK since 2019 after seven years in the Ecuadorian embassy avoiding extradition to Sweden.

The High Court accepted the deal this week.

Shaul Brazil, partner at BCL Solicitors, said: ‘A commonly deployed strategy in US extradition cases is to pursue a robust defence for as long as possible; not necessarily in order to ultimately resist extradition successfully, but to put the requested person in the best possible position to negotiate a favourable plea agreement.

‘Whether or not that was the strategy adopted by Assange, it appears to be the outcome he achieved, albeit with a price paid in the years he spent in prison.’

Rebecca Niblock, partner at Kingsley Napley, said: ‘People in the UK facing extradition requests from the US are often well advised to agree to plea deals, given the way the US plea bargaining system works, and harsh sentences in American courts.

‘The recent decision of the UK High Court to give permission to Assange to appeal may have brought some pressure to bear on him agreeing a US deal—winning the case here was by no means a certainty for the US.

‘While extradition laws have tended towards de-politicisation in recent years, the reality is that there are some cases, such as this one, in which politics and diplomacy are front and centre.

‘Most likely diplomatic pressure from the Australian prime minister played a role in finally bringing this case to a close.

‘Agreeing a plea deal in which Assange serves no more time in custody amounts to a win-win: the US gets a conviction, and Assange gets to go home.’

Issue: 8077 / Categories: Legal News , Extradition , International
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll