header-logo header-logo

Art 50: the verdict

07 November 2016 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7722 / Categories: Opinion , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail
nlj_7722_zander

Michael Zander QC predicts the government is likely to lose the appeal to the Supreme Court

Asked by NLJ for an immediate assessment of last week’s Brexit decision I wrote: “The Divisional Court’s unanimous decision is very clear and very strong. It completely rejects the arguments advanced by the Attorney General for the government. Triggering Art 50 to start withdrawal from the EU requires parliamentary approval not in the form of a vote but in the form of a statute. It would be extremely surprising if the Supreme Court reversed the decision. The government’s Brexit plans have suffered a major reverse.”

The decision provoked disturbingly offensive front-page newspaper headlines of a kind rarely seen in this country, adorned by large accusing pictures of the three judges: “The judges versus the people” (The Telegraph), “Enemies of the people” (The Daily Mail), “Three judges yesterday blocked Brexit. Now your country really does need you” (Daily Express) and the like. The Lord Chancellor, Liz Truss, with statutory

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll