header-logo header-logo

20 September 2007 / Helen Darling , Katherine Hill
Issue: 7289 / Categories: Features , EU , Wills & Probate , Banking
printer mail-detail

Are we there yet?

Is a coherent EU anti-money laundering approach to trusts within reach? ask Helen Darling and Katherine Hill

The passage of the Third European Money Laundering Directive 2005/60/EC (the Directive) into domestic law, scheduled for 15 December 2007, has not been as smooth as the government hoped. The first draft of the Money Laundering Regulations 2007 (the draft regulations) was published in January this year to widespread criticism from representative bodies including the Law Society and the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners. Concerns focused predominantly on the impact of Pt 2 of the draft regulations dealing with customer due diligence (CDD) and, particularly, a perceived failure to provide clarity on how CDD requirements apply to trusts.
Concerted lobbying by domestic bodies and, ultimately, intervention by the European Commission resulted in the definition of beneficial ownership contained in the draft regulations being significantly amended. In July 2007 the revised Money Laundering Regulations 2007 (SI 2007/2157) (the regulations) were published in what the government has stated is their final form. The changes

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll