header-logo header-logo

Arbitration

08 November 2013
Issue: 7583 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Diag Human SE v Czech Republic [2013] EWHC 3190 (Comm), [2013] All ER (D) 309 (Oct)

Under Art III of the NY Convention, the local court was free to impose its own procedural conditions, such as orders for disclosure, time limits for evidence and, in respect of compliance with those conditions, to make final or unless orders and, in the event of failure to comply with such orders, to impose sanctions including dismissal. That also included security for costs, if otherwise appropriate, and so long as non-discriminatory. The fact that there was an express remedy given by Art VI whereby a defendant might be liable for security in respect of the award and/or for costs did not take away the effect of Art III. There was no reason why, unless disqualified from obtaining security by virtue of the fact that the onus of proof was upon him, a purely passive defendant in award enforcement proceedings should not be able to seek, like any other defendant, security for costs in defending such an application. Consequently, if security for costs

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll