header-logo header-logo

23 September 2016 / John Cooper KC
Issue: 7715 / Categories: Features , Charities
printer mail-detail

Animal tragic

nlj_7715_cooper

John Cooper QC discusses the growing number of criminal cases concerning animal welfare

  • The prevalence of animal welfare cases.
  • The conduct of charities taking private prosecutions.
  • The RSPCA, dog fighting and controversy.

Cases involving animal welfare are becoming more and more prevalent, year by year.

There has been a considerable amount of controversy, in relation to the conduct of some charities concerning decisions they made about private prosecutions, in the criminal courts.

For any charity to engage with the law and particularly with the criminal court, there is a high degree of responsibility placed upon that charity to act with maturity and integrity, lest the whole ethos of charitable legal actions be brought into disrepute.

Misconceived

There are those who recently argue as a result of some controversial decisions by charities who have privately prosecuted, that there should be a complete cessation of prosecution activity. This is a misconceived approach and it would be very undesirable if the importance of charities or other campaigning organisations in taking legal actions is undermined.

Most importantly,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll