header-logo header-logo

14 January 2021 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7916 / Categories: Opinion , Covid-19 , Profession , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil litigation: An ill wind…

35694
Dominic Regan highlights the positives in civil litigation from a grim 2020

2020 was unarguably grim for so many people on so many fronts. Nevertheless, civil litigation has generated positives in various areas.

Those successful against an opponent backed by a litigation funder will rejoice that the Arkin cap of 2005 was blown off by the Court of Appeal in Chapelgate v Money (2020) EWCA Civ 246. Back in 2005 the Court of Appeal decided that the costs liability of a funder was limited (capped) to a sum equal to that which it had invested in the failed claim. In Chapelgate, the court looked at what the funder would have extracted had the claim succeeded, a consideration not identified in Arkin. Put succinctly, the bigger the upside were a claim to succeed should mean a greater downside if it didn’t. Since the funder was seeking the greater of 2.5 times what it put in or 25% of damages it followed that it should bear the full burden

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll