header-logo header-logo

Amnesty delivers verdict on LASPO

13 October 2016
Issue: 7718 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Report criticises “inherent and systematic failings” of exceptional case funding scheme

The justice system is “increasingly closed to the poorest, most vulnerable and most in need of its protection”, according to a devastating Amnesty International report into the impact of legal aid cuts.

The controversial Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO), which came into force in April 2013, made swingeing cuts to civil legal aid, knocking whole areas out of scope. In its report, published this week, Amnesty urges the government to immediately review the impact of LASPO and to ensure better provision of public legal education to ensure people can claim their rights.

Amnesty shows that the cuts have led to a loss in early specialist legal advice and gaps in provision of free legal assistance across the country. It asserts that exceptional case funding does not guarantee legal aid availability to the most vulnerable because of “inherent and systemic failings” in the scheme.

LASPO has removed organisations’ ability to provide holistic advice, even though clients often experience legal problems in clusters. They may, for example, be able to provide advice on housing but not on the underlying problems of debt or welfare benefits.

Amnesty’s report recommends extending legal aid to children and vulnerable young people, regardless of the legal issue at stake. It says children and families without “sufficient means” should be able to obtain free help in any case “where a child’s best interests are engaged”.

It calls for legal aid provision to be restored to private family cases, welfare advice and immigration cases raising human rights concerns. Other recommendations include abandoning plans for a residence test, overhauling the exceptional case funding scheme and extending legal aid to family reunification cases.

A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: “We have a generous legal aid system—last year spending more than £1.5bn on legal aid. We must ensure legal aid is sustainable and fair—both for those who need it and the taxpayer who pays for it. That is why we have made sure support remains available to the most vulnerable and in the most serious cases, and are taking action to ensure people can access the help they need.”

Issue: 7718 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll